by that presumption each person left unharmed agrees with their objectives and each harmed did not
FROM: leonhart.annie@cdc.org
can you say you know how it is the depth of those disagreements were determined
[ because she sure as hell doesn't think it's that simple, not when she sees the names there. even if it had, there needed to be that announced context. what dagger had provided wasn't context; it was a partial apology, and it was also political hot air. punishments are effective when there's a guiding force behind them.
this one is disguised. so it makes her wonder: because if agreeing had been the determining factor, then she'd be as liable to be punished as anyone else. following an objective didn't mean agreeing with it. she knew that intimately. ]
no subject
by that presumption each person left unharmed agrees with their objectives and each harmed did not
FROM: leonhart.annie@cdc.org
can you say you know how it is the depth of those disagreements were determined
[ because she sure as hell doesn't think it's that simple, not when she sees the names there. even if it had, there needed to be that announced context. what dagger had provided wasn't context; it was a partial apology, and it was also political hot air. punishments are effective when there's a guiding force behind them.
this one is disguised. so it makes her wonder: because if agreeing had been the determining factor, then she'd be as liable to be punished as anyone else. following an objective didn't mean agreeing with it. she knew that intimately. ]